Rent to Rent – Guaranteed Rent And No Work?

Updated: October 19, 2017

Under the weight of legislation, regulations and rent arrears some people get fed up of being landlords and those people now have a title “tired landlords” and are seen as the ideal target for Rent to Rent.

Female Landlord with hand over face looking stressed over Rent to Rent

Under the weight of legislation, regulations and rent arrears, some ‘tired landlords’ are turning to Rent to Rent deals.

This is the name given to the target group of landlords who would like to continue to benefit from their rental income and increase in property values but no longer feel able to deal with all the issues related to renting out a house.

Download your 2017 How to Rent guide and landlord checklist here: https://www.gov.uk/guide

Property “guru” teach their pupils to find these ‘tired landlords’ and offer them a deal that they cannot refuse.  The deal is known as Rent to Rent.

The ‘tired landlord’ is offered a guaranteed rent for a period of between three and five years if they hand over their properties to the renter who will then sub-let the property to tenants at an increased rent and make a profit from the difference.

What’s the difference between a Guaranteed Rent Scheme and Rent Guarantee Insurance?

Is Rent to Rent too good to be true?

Some of the contracts include full repairs and replacement and guarantee to hand the property back at the end of the term in the same condition that is was in at the beginning.  Sounds too good to be true doesn’t it?  This is because it usually is and when it goes wrong the owner/landlord is often left with damaged property, huge loss of rent and often sitting tenants.  There are some ethical companies and even local authorities who use the Rent to Rent model very well but there are many who do not.

Drawbacks of Rent to Rent schemes

I want to explore the potential drawbacks to enable you to make a fully informed decision should you decide to go down this route.

There has been quite a lot of press coverage on the subject of Rent to Rent and the latest story hit the headlines last Friday under the title “Mystery of missing £400,000 housing benefit payments”.

Published by Channel 4 News this story tells of London Housing Solutions, a company operating in London, which is now in administration and owes “at least 100 landlords rent”.   BBC was unable to get a statement from the owner of this company and no one is owning up to having benefited from the £400K that has not been handed over in rent.

In my opinion, it is a pity that the title of this story focuses on the fact that the rent was paid in Housing Benefit, because that misses an important issue.  The issue being that all these, 100 landlords, had handed 700 properties to London Housing Solutions  on the basis of guaranteed rent and had now lost thousands and are left with tenants on benefits still in place but with no AST’s because they had not put them there.

One of the cases report in the Chanel 4 article –

“We trusted this company to take responsibility for this property for three years and to pay us guaranteed rent,” Mr Robinson said.

“We’ve held out our side of the bargain and they’ve left us in the lurch.”

“Meanwhile, Mr Robinson’s property remains tenanted by a family of 14, whose contract is with London Housing Solutions.  The living area of the property is in darkness, after an electricity failure, and the boiler no longer produces hot water”.

And what help can landlords expect from the local authorities who are paying the rent for these tenants? The report goes on to say –

“Lewisham Council, which is understood to be the biggest single client of “LHS” paying around £300,000 a month in housing benefit to the two companies, said: “If property owners are owed money by their agents, then they need to pursue recovery with them.”

The problem is this company is not the landlords “agent”.  What exactly are they?

Tenants? They may well have used a Tenancy Agreement with the right to sub-let, many companies do, but this has no legal status since the company are not occupying the property and therefore are not legally tenants.

Agents?  If no Agency Agreement has been signed and the company did not consult the landlord/owner on who could live in the properties they were not acting as agents either and, even if there were, they are now in administration. So much for the “guaranteed rent”

All of the landlords who signed up with this company were buying into the “no work but guaranteed rent” dream.   They are now left high and dry while they decide how to move forward.  Do they evict the tenants?  If so how ? What grounds would they have? The benefits were paid and therefore there are no rent arrears. The landlords don’t know the term of the tenancies because they have no copies of the Tenancy Agreements that the tenants have signed. They may well have fixed terms of several years – who knows? Certainly not the landlord victims.

The landlord/owners are, however, legally obliged to keep the properties in good order and that includes Mr Robinson, who must now reinstate the electricity and get the boiler up and working despite the fact that he has not received the rent.

Rent to Rent – a Big Mess!

I have been asked to help several landlords who have found themselves in a similar situation over the last year or so.  I ask them all the same question “Did you check that the company had assets and insurance to support the guarantee of rent”. The answer is usually “No they guaranteed the rent and I thought that was enough”.

As I said earlier, many people are paying to attend seminars where the Rent to Rent strategy is being taught.  Many of these people haven’t the money to buy their own properties to rent and this is a No Money Down (NMD) strategy to help them. It is risk free for those people because if it all goes wrong they walk away and, since they have no assets, the “Tired Landlords” who they have targeted have little or no chance of seeing their money or having their properties restored to good condition – never mind that they are left with sitting tenants and legal obligations to maintain the property.

Am I the only person who is thinking “Why would a landlord work for years to build a portfolio and just hand it over to the first person who charms him with “guarantees” that are not backed by assets”?

More to the point

“Why not simply engage a good Letting and Managing Agent if you are tired?”

If you are a Tired Landlord and are tempted to sign up with a Rent to Renter –

Due your due diligence before entering into a Rent to Rent deal

Don’t forget to check with your mortgage lender that you are allowed to sign a contract which assigns the right to choose the tenants to a third party and that your insurance policy covers you for a property that you will not be controlling yourself – often with “difficult” tenant groups being placed there.

After 42 years I have not yet become tired of dealing with my tenants and in reality I have very few problems and very little stress. I put this down to –

1.    Maintaining my properties in good order through some well trusted contractors
2.    Using LettingAProperty.com to advertise on respected web sites and to carry out referencing and credit checks
3.    Doing my own viewings so that I get a “feeling” about my prospective tenants and I can explain my ethos and expectations as a landlord
4.    Knowing that I have the option to use the LAP guaranteed rent on time service at a very small fee
5.    Always being fair in my expectations, to avoid arguing over deposits at the end of tenancies.

The day may yet come when I want to “walk away” and if it does I will be looking for a good Property Management company, which is a member of a respected organisation, has Client Money Protection Insurance and is a member of the Property Ombudsman scheme.  This will cover me if things do go wrong.

Would I every consider handing over my life’s work to a company or person who had no assets or insurance to cover me if things went wrong?

If I do I expect my children to use their Power of Attorney to stop me because they will have the evidence that they need to show that I have lost my marbles.

LettingaProperty.com will guarantee to pay your rent on time every month, regardless if your tenant doesn’t!  This is not a Rent-To-Rent scheme!
Summary
Rent to Rent - Guaranteed Rent And No Work?
Article Name
Rent to Rent - Guaranteed Rent And No Work?
Description
Rent to Rent is what property “guru” teach their pupils to find tired landlords and offer them a deal that they cannot refuse. Is it to good to be true?
Author
Publisher Name
LettingaProperty.com
Publisher Logo

Get Landlord Updates

Be the first to find out about important updates to the Private Rented Sector that could affect YOUR rental income.

To see how we use your information, please refer to our terms and privacy policy.

FacebookTwitterWhatsAppGoogle+LinkedIn

Tags:

8 Comments

  1. Mary Latham March 28, 2014 at 7:53 pm #

    This comment was posted on a facebook property group today. “Interesting discussions with the police about R2R. It appears that there is no legal contract that can protect you as landlord – be warned!”

  2. Mary Latham March 16, 2014 at 1:23 pm #

    Thank you Nearly Legal for pointing out that the R2R company ARE tenants. Contractual/commercial, not AST. In other words they are commercial tenants but not residential tenants and therefore the process for ending the lease would not be the same as the Possession process for removing a residential tenant. The problem of removing the actual tenant occupiers still remains if the lease is ended and the occupiers are still in the property

  3. Mary Latham March 16, 2014 at 1:07 pm #

    I am really sorry that you were a rent to rent victim themanwhocan. Thank you for sharing this with other landlords to prevent them making the same mistakes

  4. themanwhocan March 15, 2014 at 6:05 pm #

    Did it once – never again. A lack of communication about a leak cost me 1 years of rent. I will not touch another rent guarantee scheme again after that experience. Not only that, they just handed me my keys at a weeks notice after moving the tenant out in the third year. My fault for not reading the agreement properly(novice to rental sector and terminology) and promise of rental guarantee, I didn’t know who were the tenants who actually lived there in those 3/5 years agreement. I could have tried going after them but I was just happy to be released from the contract with them because of delays with rental cheque in some months was becoming a regular feature. They got paid via BACS, issued you a cheque so that leaves you running around to cash it. I know many others don’t do this. I was one of the lucky ones because I was paid up to the time tenant moved out. Other landlords were owed a years rent when the firm went bust.

  5. Mary Latham March 15, 2014 at 3:40 pm #

    I have heard from several sources that the rent to rent systems that Northwood use work very well and you are one of the companies that I referred to when I said ” There are some ethical companies and even local authorities who use the Rent to Rent model very well”. I expect that you too suffer because so many people have jumped on the bandwagon and are now bringing this strategy into question. I also expect that, like me, you would like to see some regulation which would protect unsuspecting landlords from the rogue operators?

  6. AC NorthwoodUK March 14, 2014 at 5:08 pm #

    You raise some really important points Mary, it is absolutely essential that landlords do their due diligence. Rent 2 rent can go so horribly wrong and the issue of subletting is far more complicated than people think. At Northwood we spend a lot of time making sure our agreements are suitable for what we do and our network of 80 offices are supported by a sound business model and an experienced team at the franchise office. I think it is important for landlords to make sure that they can take issues further should there be a problem. All Northwood offices are members of the Property Ombudsman and we are one of the founding members of SafeAgent, offering extra security for landlords

  7. Jonathan Daines March 13, 2014 at 10:23 am #

    A great article Mary and I can only but echo your words of advice. If a landlord is considering the Rent to Rent option, DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE FIRST. The rental market is buoyant. If you have an empty property and it has been on the market for a while with an agent, before accepting defeat, I would urge the landlord to consider an alternative method of guaranteeing their rent – perhaps taking a look at our Rent on Time package.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Rent to Rent - What is it and how does it work? - Capitum - December 2, 2017

    […] In order to be protected, it is vital to do your due diligence before moving forward. For more advice on how to be safe in the rent to rent industry, read the Lettingaproperty.com post here. […]

Leave a reply

Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all comments are moderated according to our comment policy and your email address will NOT be published. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation.

Create your own personal 'Gravatar' profile here.